Blog - Page 2 of 2 -

8 May 2012

Lost Your Google Rankings? Been Bitten By a Panda or Penguin?

Google Update – Over Optimisation Hits Some Sites Hard

Have you suffered a dramatic movement in search results in Google lately? If so you have been affected by the Google Algorithm update, code named “Penguin”. Last year, 2011 was the year of the Panda, this year it is Panda plus Penguin.

Essentially what may have worked for you in the past in creating links to your site through various Google approved means, be it guest blog posting, infographics, contests and competitions, directory listings, link exchanging, blog posting and commenting, video publishing, web 2.0 publishing, press releases – the list goes on – if you have done exactly what Google used to want and did it in such a way as to “over optimise” then you will have suffered the penalty.

What Do I Do If My Ranking Got Slammed?

Firstly rest assured, in most cases you can recover your lost ranking. Our lab work has come up with a proven strategy for ranking well post Panda/Penguin. In many cases what determines an over optimisation is to do with anchor text. Exact match anchor text to be specific. In the past, that was acceptable to have lots of links pointing at your page that used the keyword you wished to rank for, as the underlined part – the words that form the hyperlink – back to your website page, that was optimised for that keyword. As with all things that Google do, they never stay the same, hence the need to have a continual finger on the pulse so to speak, and make sure that what you are doing is in parallel to what they are looking for.

The Google team would actually like it if you didn’t do any SEO or search engine optimisation at all, this was pointed out in their recent public annoucement of the Penguin release. They don’t mind on page optimisation to help their Googlebot find your content but they frown upon anyone trying to “game” the search results. Well unfortunately if you were to do exactly what the Google mantra dictates – “create great content and people will link to you” – then you would quite truly rank for nothing at all. You see the whole idea of people naturally wanting to “link” to you is based upon firstly them finding you. Now how are they going to find your website if it is not ranking in the top 10 search results in Google in the first place? And of course Google will only rank sites that other sites link to. What we have here is the old “chicken and egg” connundrum. NO Links = No Ranking – No One Finds you.

What Can Helium SEO Do To Help Me Rank Better?

Well I am glad you have asked, because our link building strategies have ensured our clients have maintained their rankings and in many cases moved up substantially. If this is not the experience you have found with your current SEO provider or SEO strategy, then it just might be time to speak to someone who can help. Greg Gillespie is the #1 ranked SEO Consultant in Sydney and he is waiting for you to call.

The Art of SEO

No tags here

15 Aug 2011

What Gets 80% of the Clicks on the Front Page of Google?

What Gets 80% of the Clicks on the Front Page of Google?

Ever wondered am I spending my money wisely on Google Adwords? Even though you may be making a profit with a well constructed and properly managed campaign, you may actually be spending too much for that traffic.

Allow me to demonstrate exactly what I mean in real dollar terms.

It is a well documented statistic that 80% of the clicks that web surfers make on the front page of Google are in the “free listings” or “organic results” of the serps. Only 20% of all clicks go to the ads or sponsored links in Google. The sponsored links or ads are where you listing turns up if you are part of the Google Adwords advertising program. Surprisingly then is the next statistic that goes along the opposite tack, 80% of all advertising dollars are spent on the area that only gets 20% of the clicks, yes that’s right Google Adwords.

So we have a perfect example about how much more expensive paid Google listing are when compared to free listings, (or atleast how much people are prepared to pay to appear on the front page of Google in the different areas). For just 205 of the budget’s you have the top ranking sites getting 80% of the traffic. Not bad if you are part of the top few listings. In fact the absolute lions share goes to that number one ranked website, which incidently gets a whopping four times the number of clicks than just the number two spot. See image below.

The Art of SEO

No tags here

15 Mar 2011

Data- The SEO’s Best Friend – Is Now Changing

Well if you have been around the SEO circles for some time, you will no doubt be aware that one of the industries finest sources of data, the Yahoo Site Explorer is being phased out by years end. This is due to the merge with Bing, the Microsoft, rust bucket version of Google (as it has been described by someone), and therefore no longer of use.

But I ask a question here on this point, where will our reliable source of backlink data come from and will it be free?

Majestic SEO the secret weapon of many a stealth seo fighter have stepped in with their private data bin of almost one trillion records database, but with one small problem attached, they charge money.

Having been a member and fan of Majestic for some years, it is very different to what we have been used to. For starters the SEO Quake toolbar addon for Firefox will no longer allow such quick and insanely helpful information to be available at our fingertips.

Does anyone know how this is going to be replaced?

Just curious for peoples comments.

The Art of SEO

No tags here

14 Mar 2011

Google Algorithm Update: Panda

Well if you have suddenly noticed a dramatic drop in your search engine rankings over the last couple of weeks, then you may have fallen foul of the latest update to the search engine algorithm in the Google search engine.

It was on the date of 24 of February, that Google, the big-dog in the search game, decided to release their latest algorithm on their search engine. Their algorithm is designed to find the most relevant websites as pertaining to your search query or keyword that you type into the search box on This algorithm as it is called, is a complex piece of computer wizardry that attempts to analyse all websites and their worthiness, which are associated in some way with the keywords a search will enter into the search box.

There are over 200 points of reference that Google uses to determine who the winner is for the top #1 spot on it’s organic search results. It then presents in descending order those that don’t quite make the grade, in order to return the most relevant website for your search.

The recent changes that came into effect in late February 2011, have been designed to penalize any website trying to artificially get to the top of the search results, who happened to be using what are known as “link-farms” to achieve their desired result. Apparently this may have been working for some websites before the Google change and now is considered an outlawed practice. The result of being inside one of these so called link farms has meant in many cases rankings have dropped to some page way, way beyond the first page of results.

The types of content and linking that Google favours needs to be unique by nature and be seen to be a natural linking process. Google expect that if you create a great website with unique content on it then people will find your site, and create a link from their site to yours. And according to Google if this happens more times for your website than for your competitors site, then you are deemed the worthy winner of the #1 ranked website on the planet.

This notion presents many problems when you analyse what is being proposed by Google as “fair play”.

Firstly how are people to find your site in the first place if rank on page 9 of the search results because no one has linked to you? Think about your own search practices, how often do you venture past the first page when searching for something or someone? Not often if you are the majority who barely click beyond the first two listings.

How about we use a real world example to get the clearer picture of what I am describing here, which is really unpractical at best and down right simplistic delusion at worst.

Example#1: Outdoor Home Lighting Website

Let’s say Jim owns an outdoor lighting business that he has been running for over 20 years, with a wealth of customers and an outstanding reputation for providing excellent products and customer service that is second to none. Jim approaches me as an online marketing consultant with his dilemma. He has just been informed by his website designer that Google demands that the only way to get listed in their search engine is to have people, in fact a lot of people, create a link to his website, (just launched 2 weeks ago and ranking nowhere for the important keywords in his industry) and yet no one knows it even exists

Is Jim supposed to somehow convince his happy customers to take the time to login to a blog somewhere and somehow talk about his wonderful business and create an anchor text based comment on a blog that doesn’t have the nofollow tag (something that strips the link value out of the link) and that doesn’t see the comment as spam and just delete it.

Now this has to happen not a couple of times but it needs to happen more times than any other outdoor lighting specialist in Jim’s area, just to prove to the world of searchers that Jim’s outdoor lighting business is the best.

Pretty unrealistic wouldn’t you agree?

Considering that most of the top results have been achieved by the assistance of search engine optimization, or SEO as it is known, in markets where there is money to be made and you realize that Jim has only a couple of options to consider if he wants to attract the online customer to his business. Option one is to play by the rules and stay out of the top results possibly forever, or option 2, use his gut instinct and business acumen that tells him that he is the best outdoor lighting professional in his region and he deserves to be listed at the top and not his competitors. With option 2 his only choice is to find a capable, highly qualified search engine optimization specialist who can get him the results of a top ranking and pay him or her to do the job for him.

If Jim chooses carefully, does a search for seo consultant + city name and finds the top ranked consultant, he has a fairly safe bet that they can do the job for him and the end result will be that not only does Google get what it set out to do, present the best most qualified website as the top result, but the searcher finds Jim’s lighting business ranked at the top and some of them join the ranks of happy customers that he has been creating for over 20 years.

And in conclusion to my point here regarding the Google Farmer update, that search engine optimization consultant is probably not going to be ranked at the top any more if he or she were using any as untoward as a “link farm” to achieve their top ranking.

The Art of SEO

No tags here

5 Jan 2011

Helium SEO Blog Launch

Well I finally thought it best to chip on the conversation and put up my SEO findings, rantings and ravings. You all know I have been fairly opinionated and controversial about SEO tactics, what is Black Hat SEO, what is White Hat SEO, and is there really a difference.

So from now on my thoughts here first, your comments are welcomed. Spammer will be terminated naturally.

Subscribe or get the RSS feed.

Thanks for following.

Info Pages, The Art of SEO

No tags here